It's the classic post-army dilemma, argued over in every release-party and group chat: South America or Southeast Asia (with India-Nepal as the wildcard third option)? Both continents have a deep Israeli trail, both can swallow six months without you noticing, and both will change you. But they are genuinely different trips — in cost, difficulty, weather windows, and what a normal day feels like. Here's the honest comparison, without pretending there's one right answer.
Day to day, Southeast Asia is cheaper — comfortably $20-40 a day for hostels, street food, buses, and beer, and India runs cheaper still. South America's daily costs aren't wildly higher ($35-55 in most of Peru, Bolivia, and Colombia; more in Chile and Argentina depending on the economy that month), but the trip costs more overall: the flight from Israel is longer and pricier, distances between stops are huge (which means internal flights or very long buses), and the headline activities — Machu Picchu entry and trek, Salar de Uyuni jeep tours, Patagonia logistics — are big single expenses that Asia mostly doesn't have. Rule of thumb: the same savings buy you noticeably more months in Asia. For the full breakdown, see our backpacking budget guide.
Southeast Asia is forgiving: the November-March dry season is ideal, but there's decent weather somewhere in the region year-round, so your release date matters less. South America punishes bad timing more — Patagonia is really a November-March (southern summer) destination, the Salar and the Andes trekking season have their own windows, and the Inca Trail closes in February. If you're heading south with Patagonia on the list, plan the trip around it. If you're leaving at an awkward time of year, Asia flexes around you better.
This is the real difference. Southeast Asia is the easy, social trip: short cheap flights and sleeper buses, English (or pointing) works everywhere, the banana-pancake circuit is so well-worn you can plan a week ahead and always land in a full hostel of people your age. It's the better first long trip and the better party. South America is more of an expedition: distances are enormous, buses run 20+ hours, logistics take planning, and Spanish genuinely matters — even survival Spanish transforms the trip. The payoff is scale: Patagonia's granite towers, the Salar de Uyuni salt flats, Machu Picchu at dawn, the Amazon. Nothing in Asia feels that vast; almost nothing in South America feels as effortless as Asia.
Southeast Asia is one of the easiest places on earth to backpack: violent crime against travelers is rare, and the real risks are mundane — motorbike accidents, bucket-drink decisions, and the occasional scam. South America demands more street awareness: pickpocketing and phone-snatching are common in big cities, you take registered taxis at night, and you keep valuables boring. Millions of backpackers do it without incident — it just asks for habits Asia never forces you to build. In both regions, the thing most likely to actually ruin your trip is a moped, a wave, or a mountain — so get real travel insurance either way.
Asia wins on food, and it isn't close for most travelers: Thai night markets, Vietnamese pho at dawn, Indian thalis — cheap, everywhere, and endlessly varied. South America has real highlights (Peruvian ceviche and the Lima food scene, Argentine steak and wine, Colombian fruit) but day-to-day trail food leans on rice, chicken, and menú del día repetition. If eating is a main event of travel for you, that's a genuine point for Asia.
Both continents have a full Hummus Trail infrastructure — Hebrew-speaking hostels, Chabad houses, and route intel recycled through every Friday-night dinner — but it runs through different arteries:
There's no wrong continent, only a wrong match. Choose Southeast Asia if it's your first long trip, budget is tight, you want maximum social ease and food, or your dates don't line up with South America's seasons. Choose South America if big nature is what you're traveling for, you have the budget and the months to do it justice, you're up for harder logistics (and some Spanish), and Patagonia or the Andes are on your list. And plenty of people simply do both — Asia first as the warm-up, South America later as the main event. The only real mistake is rushing one continent to squeeze in the other.
Southeast Asia. Daily costs run about $20-40 versus $35-55 in most of South America, and South America adds pricier flights, long internal distances, and big-ticket activities like Machu Picchu, the Salar de Uyuni, and Patagonia. The same savings last noticeably longer in Asia.
Southeast Asia, for most people. Logistics are easy, the backpacker circuit is extremely social, English gets you everywhere, and mistakes are cheap. South America rewards travelers who are comfortable with long distances, more planning, and some Spanish.
You can survive without it on the main trail, but even basic Spanish transforms the trip — buses, markets, homestays, and small towns all open up. Many backpackers start with a week or two of Spanish classes in Medellín, Sucre, or Buenos Aires.
Millions of backpackers travel it without incident, but it demands more street awareness than Southeast Asia: watch for pickpockets and phone-snatching in big cities, use registered taxis at night, and keep valuables low-key. On both continents, accidents — not crime — are the most common trip-ender, so carry real travel insurance.
Southeast Asia is best November-March but workable year-round. South America is more seasonal: Patagonia needs the southern summer (November-March), while Peru and Bolivia trekking peaks May-September. If your dates are awkward, Asia flexes better.
In Asia: Thailand (Bangkok, Pai, the islands), Vietnam, Laos, and the India-Nepal route through Kasol, Manali, Goa, and Kathmandu. In South America: Argentina and Patagonia, Bolivia, Peru (Cusco), and Colombia — with Chabad houses anchoring both trails.
Start mapping your trip · Read more on Hummus Trail